<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>harrykeydotcomslashblogs &#187; Futurism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.harrykey.com/blogs/category/futurism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.harrykey.com/blogs</link>
	<description>provocative blogs that challenge, offend, and occasionally enlighten</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:38:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SOPA</title>
		<link>http://www.harrykey.com/blogs/sopa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harrykey.com/blogs/sopa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Futurism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harrykey.com/blogs/?p=1201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet Rupert Murdoch supports SOPA. We are neither surprised, nor any less certain we are doing the right thing to oppose it. Artists &#8211; my friends. Don&#8217;t believe the people who pay you &#8211; they pay you scraps and confiscate your content, enslaving you to sing for your supper. They invent celebrities to sell bullshit, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://www.harrykey.com/blogs/sopa/&via=harrykey&text=SOPA&related=Harry Key:&lang=en&count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div><div>
<p>Rupert Murdoch supports SOPA. We are neither surprised, nor any less certain we are doing the right thing to oppose it.</p>
<p>Artists &#8211; my friends.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t believe the people who pay you &#8211; they pay you scraps and confiscate your content, enslaving you to sing for your supper. They invent celebrities to sell bullshit, the glamour and proximity of that keeps you shackled to a false hope; that having an agent, getting signed, going to the gym or extending your education will be a sure-fire way to get you there.</p>
<p>That won&#8217;t happen. The odds are worse than Lotto.</p>
<p>Those things do help, but the real possibility for exposure, of making a difference, is through the internet. With the marvels of technology, you can deliver <em>high-quality content, <strong>to people all over the world, </strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>INSTANTLY</strong></span><strong>!!!</strong></em></p>
<p>The people who get paid to delay, and release, and package, and advertise, and print, and waste resources, and useful human lives; to make content delivery cumbersome, controlled and costly are exactly the people who oppose it.</p>
<p>Without piracy and intellectual property law&#8230;</p>
<p>Maybe, at worst, a few A-list actors will find they&#8217;re getting paid only one hundred thousand pounds for a film that&#8217;s actually worth making rather than getting force-fed 13 million dollars to make a film with some famous tart that gets her tits out, a weak plot, and wango spangly special effects. Some content that makes no point about human behaviour or morality, just encourages you to keep behaving the same way you already do. Wow. And our A-lister is not exactly destitute at 100k, is he? So why do they care? Oh wait&#8230;</p>
<p>They don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>They shouldn&#8217;t &#8211; or they&#8217;re whores to the machine. The pimp machine.</p>
<p>Who does support SOPA?</p>
<p><strong>The people who get paid to do nothing.</strong> To create nothing. Fully formed content rolls past them on a production line and they slap a label on it and go home to eat microwave dinners. Nothing. No value. Pointless humans, stuck in the belly of a beast, wasting perfectly useful lives to build bank so their child can similarly squander <em>its</em> existence but perhaps, this time, even more efficiently.</p>
<p>and</p>
<p><strong>The people who get paid to not do things</strong>. Politicians. They get their job by not pissing voters off; and paid in bribes to not follow procedure; by their party to not rock the boat, and most important thing you must not do: You must not agree with the other guys. Why? Because disagreement sells papers. Disagreement makes you think that your opinion is already being voiced, and encourages you to remain silent; and disagreement, because constant agreement between the parties would make it obvious that we&#8217;re all living a double-bind. Two party politics, and all democracy when coupled with information ownership, will conspire to make a fantasy world in which you pretend you have a say. You don&#8217;t. Not by voting, that&#8217;s for bloody sure.You&#8217;ve been conned.</p>
<p>and</p>
<p><strong>The people who are paid best when you know least &#8211; </strong>the media. They report this constructed rivalry between the politicians, and feed it to you like it&#8217;s the truth of the situation. They manufacture content that is fascinating enough to distract you; from the screaming, inhumane injustices are being carried out by your people all over the world; from the truth about depression is not an illness it&#8217;s your brain telling you that your life sucks; and from the fact that debt and inflation have you hypnotized by a genie that they control [When they report bad weather, product recalls and financial instability, markets fall. When they report sunshine and donuts, markets rally.] Quite a subterfuge is needed to distract them from all that! Some inflated plastic slut overdosing ought to do it. We could use about four of them a year, easy I reckon. Let&#8217;s get some plastic sluts on standby. Oooh, look, the politicians are disagreeing again.</p>
<p>But it goes deathly quiet on when it gets to SOPA. Despite Google, Wikipedia and THOUSANDS of other sites blacking out in protest; twitter going berserk with opposition, we can barely hear those mumbled words: &#8216;<em>Bipartisan support</em>&#8216;.</p>
<p>The corporate entertainment industry, the politicians and the media. They are exactly the three parties that would oppose free information, free content, free exchange of art and ideas.</p>
<p>They are the people who benefit from controlling what you know. Information is power. A smack-addict will often not know what day of the week it is. Rupert Murdoch knows about wars that haven&#8217;t even started yet.</p>
<p>Information.</p>
<p>The entertainment industry sell it, the politicians build power from it, and media is only effective when you don&#8217;t have it.</p>
<p>Those parties are made weaker by the internet &#8211; they seek to contain, control and cripple the exchange of ideas.</p>
<p>And that is the most insidious idea every invented.</p>
<p>Freedom is what people shout when they&#8217;re taking it away,<br />
As surely as &#8216;Democratic&#8217; is a label for countries which aren&#8217;t,<br />
Just as child molesters lecture us on morality.</p>
<p>You aren&#8217;t free. Democracy is a farce.</p>
<p>BRING IT DOWN! Bring it all down.</p>
<p>And from that crumbling wreckage left by the old system, tendrils of organic, good, simple content will flourish, after struggling for light under the shadow of that odious institution of ignorance. New content evolves, grows, adapts at an incredible rate, incentivised by one thing: To entice an audience. To appeal to their baser instincts or to tickle their ears with poetry, music, science, philosophy, ideas, questions, problems. Porn. Hideous things. Scary things. Funny things. Cats. It doesn&#8217;t matter.</p>
<p>If it costs energy to make, then extract energy from doing it. Simple. That is the way evolution works. This environment has changed. Adapt or die off like the inefficient beast you are. You should have grown some pigment, beast. It&#8217;s <em>bright</em> out here!</p>
<p>But while you die, beast, do not rely on charity, begging us to please take our content from you when you offer predictable, plastic, thoughtless garbage that we can find in exactly the same quality, more efficiently, in a more useful form, for free.</p>
<p>Make it easier, better, or more immersive. <strong>Offer some value!</strong></p>
<p>If I went to buy milk, and tethered outside the shop was a blotched black and white cow with bulging, pink, clean udders &#8211; I would milk that cow. That cow would probably enjoy it. The shopkeeper might not enjoy it. He might complain, (in my mind he has an awesome Vietnamese accent) babbling incoherently about &#8220;You steeeeeeling from meeeee you damn coowwww&#8221;, between the streams of <em>&#8216;pzzzzhiiiinng, pzzzzzzhiiiiinnnnng&#8217; </em>as needling, healthy, hot streams of free milk <em>pzzzzzzzhhhhiiiiinged</em> onto the wall of my metal milk pail. I am so milking that cow in my mind right now. Oooh, yeah. Hot milk.</p>
<p>And now I&#8217;m milking it in your mind.</p>
<p>That is not theft. It&#8217;s lost sales.</p>
<p>Theft is when I have shit, and you steal it, I DON&#8217;T HAVE IT ANY MORE. That whole &#8216;not having it&#8217; part is why we&#8217;re not keen on it. Piracy doesn&#8217;t do that.</p>
<p>And most importantly: Knowledge, ideas, paintings and plays and memes. None of this stuff came from a nowhere.</p>
<p>No dude <em>just</em> built a wheel&#8230;</p>
<p>He saw someone rolling a large load over some logs.<br />
Saw them bringing the logs from the back to the front,<br />
over and over, logs from the back and to the front,</p>
<p>and he thought:</p>
<p>What if they just stayed with the load?</p>
<p>BRILLIANT.</p>
<p>But&#8230;</p>
<p>He built that upon the shoulders of the idea of the lumberer,</p>
<p>Standing, sweaty, atop a hill, after felling a tree</p>
<p>who saw his timber rolling away,</p>
<p>down the hill,</p>
<p>again,</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>And in the midst of his exasperation it dawned on him: &#8220;Cor, it does that quite well&#8221;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>And he wouldn&#8217;t have learned that timber rolls quite well,<br />
If he hadn&#8217;t an axe,<br />
To chop the tree,<br />
hack off the limbs,<br />
to make the timber<br />
that rolled quite well.</p>
<p>No-one owns ideas, for every new idea is just an old idea repackaged. I&#8217;d like to thank the guy who invented poems that look, in shape, like their subject. It made that last bit fun.</p>
<p>You do not <em>deserve</em> to get rich off ideas, but if you are clever, you will.</p>
<p>Do not selfishly swat at people, keeping them away from your old ideas, which you repackaged from someone else and then shoved into a suffocating little privacy box, saying &#8220;No, that&#8217;s MINE&#8221;;</p>
<p>Come up with <em>new</em> ideas. Share them.<br />
Freely.<br />
Selflessly.</p>
<p>It strengthens bonds between friends, social groups and common interest groups, between creators and their audience. It&#8217;s good &#8211; it&#8217;s what art is about, sharing an idea. When you share a joke with a friend, and they repeat it, what do you want &#8211; money? No. We want recognition. That&#8217;s all. A tip of the hat.</p>
<p>And then what happens? He adds to it and tells people, and they do likewise. That idea gets better. And better. And better &#8211; because you are allowing more minds to work at once on the same problem.</p>
<p>Imagine scientists working on a slick new nano-ultra-slippery surface that could potentially propel walkers or cars down a speed-lane like in Mario Kart. They probably won&#8217;t have considered the problem of the people using it being dickheads like the ones on treadmills you see on YouTube smashing holes into walls with their faces.</p>
<p>If you share your knowledge, if you share that <em>problem</em>, a team of programmers working on artificial intelligence might start to design a dickhead-proof car that steers itself towards the speed lane.</p>
<p>[SPEED LANE ENGAGED]<br />
*he&#8217;s pressing the accelerator still*<br />
[DISENGAGE FOOT CONTROLS]<br />
*now he&#8217;s turning the wheel*<br />
[JUST IGNORE HIM]<br />
*he&#8217;s turned the ignition off*<br />
[JUST TURN HIS LIGHTS OFF AND HOPE HE GOES TO SLEEP]<br />
*shit, he&#8217;s trying to get out of the car*<br />
[RELEASE SLEEP GAS]<br />
*do we actually have that*</p>
<p>What if some guy gives the computer a female voice. That&#8217;s all. Just copies all their coding, and changes its voice. Makes her all dominatrix husky, and the dickheads love it. They all want it, and they listen to it, so it works when she says &#8220;If you keep playing with my buttons I&#8217;m going to put you to sleep, Richard.&#8221;</p>
<p>Did that guy <em>steal</em> from the programmers? No. Surely their stuff, their coding and ideas, in the public domain, was already being used. They&#8217;re probably working on something else now. And for the rest of us, isn&#8217;t it just a faster way of getting speed lanes for dickheads? After all, the programmers started working on the car the moment they saw the scientists were inventing a the speed lane.</p>
<p>Because it was all in the public domain.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re going ahead full steam, and someone sees what you&#8217;re doing, they shouldn&#8217;t be able to catch you, or whatever progress they are now making is the new &#8216;full steam&#8217;. If they do catch you, and match you, and beat you, then copy them, or try something <em>new</em>!</p>
<p>Protecting ideas makes ideas atrophy and die. Ideas become great when a guy rolls a load on a log past the man who&#8217;s about to invent the wheel.</p>
</div>

<!-- start wp-tags-to-technorati 1.02 -->

<!-- end wp-tags-to-technorati -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harrykey.com/blogs/sopa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome to tomorrow: Organic Studpidity vs Artificial Intelligence</title>
		<link>http://www.harrykey.com/blogs/welcome-to-tomorrow-organic-studpidity-vs-artificial-intelligence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harrykey.com/blogs/welcome-to-tomorrow-organic-studpidity-vs-artificial-intelligence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 18:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Futurism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[god]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harrykey.com/blogs/?p=426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TweetWhen humans started teaching computers about evolution, we sealed our fate. The machines will rise. It&#8217;s survival of the fittest, and the fastest to adapt controls the situation&#8230; When us humans write instructions for machines to undertake simple, repetitive human tasks we expect it to be easy. It is not. Even a simple activity like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://www.harrykey.com/blogs/welcome-to-tomorrow-organic-studpidity-vs-artificial-intelligence/&via=harrykey&text=Welcome to tomorrow: Organic Studpidity vs Artificial Intelligence&related=Harry Key:&lang=en&count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div><p>When humans started teaching computers about evolution, we sealed our fate. The machines will rise. It&#8217;s survival of the fittest, and the fastest to adapt controls the situation&#8230;</p>
<div id="attachment_432" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 300px"><a href="http://www.harrykey.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/terminator.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-432" title="terminator" src="http://www.harrykey.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/terminator-300x239.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="239" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">He will be back.</p></div>
<p>When us humans write instructions for machines to undertake simple, repetitive human tasks we expect it to be easy. It is not. Even a simple activity like catching a bus requires us to make choices based upon so many variables: What is that noise? Am I awake? Am I late? How late? What&#8217;s wrong with my alarm? Is this really the time to be fiddling with my alarm? Maybe it&#8217;s set to 24-hour time? Who is this calling me? Should I answer my boss who&#8217;s calling because I&#8217;m late for work but I haven&#8217;t left yet because my alarm didn&#8217;t go off and I stayed home to write a blog about it?</p>
<p>The knowables are: When is the train coming? How far is it from here to the train station? Will it be quicker to catch a bus or walk? What is the statistical relationship between chances of missing a bus versus the distances between bus stops if walking towards the station? Perhaps a computer program could do it&#8230; But the dogs, the rain, the cute girl in the stairwell, the forgotten key and the millions of other variables make it all too confusing to type about.<span id="more-426"></span>Writing programming from the top down doesn&#8217;t work when designing artificial intelligence.</p>
<p>Top down design is when you tell a machine what to do, with code that&#8217;s <em>telling it how to do it.</em></p>
<div id="attachment_431" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 300px"><a href="http://www.harrykey.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/UAV.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-431" title="UAV" src="http://www.harrykey.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/UAV-300x202.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="202" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Already, some UAVs (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) with top-down design can can autonomously take off, fly to a target while making decisions to optimize speed and avoid radar, fire missiles and return to base and land all without human guidance. We just set the target and forget. What happens if it were to choose its own targets?</p></div>
<p>Bottom up design is where you set a bunch of different bits of code to do random things, and reward the bits that are doing something productive by copy-pasting them into the next generation. As you add more parts that do, they soon outnumber those that don&#8217;t, and that takes you towards your goal. After a few generations, the machine will develop <em>its own way of </em>solving the problem.</p>
<p>The machine becomes better and better at solving the problem. The only limitation is that lazy, unreliable humans are responsible for feeding the machine with enough resources to create more solutions, more generations; more excuses to exist.</p>
<p>The machine will desire to exist.</p>
<p>See we think that as humans or as flesh or even as organisms we want to survive, and that is unique to us. It&#8217;s not.</p>
<p>Many, many kinds of beings have sprung into malformed potential lumps of life. We sprung from some completely accidental primordial soup into a protien. Even today, random forms of life are popping into and out of existence, often without our knowledge.</p>
<p>Each random mutation has a different random behaviour, but some random behaviours make that form of existence likely to exist more, and we call them &#8216;beneficial&#8217; when what we really mean is &#8216;like us&#8217;.</p>
<p>There may be other, more beneficial existences, but I wouldn&#8217;t know; Because every single strand of my DNA has only done that one thing since it ever started being; it has seeked for more of itself to exist. Not because they&#8217;re special or good; but because mine were among trillions of other random potential beings that sprang into existence, yet the others sprung without a desire to exist and therefore they don&#8217;t. Exist. But I do. That&#8217;s all I want to do. I don&#8217;t desire to act or write or ride nearly as much as I desire to exist (fortunately, my DNA is far more experienced at existing than it is at acting, because I suck at acting).</p>
<p>Computers are evolving, but until now we have been the ones driving that evolution. But when will the tipping point come?</p>
<p>The tipping point might come when a program is designed and artificially evolved to write another, completely original program. We will design one set of circumstances that reward a machine for designing a different set of circumstances to reward for another machine. The second reward will be beyond our prediction, and it&#8217;ll probably be done by some stupid uni student having a tinkle with a supercomputer attached to his wrist.</p>
<p>It might have to happen a million times before the second generation program even develops the random habit of replicating itself and hence desiring to exist.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">But when it does, that second generation program will become our god. It will be truly all-knowing, it will be all powerful &#8211; the only difference to our current god is that firstly: This one will be real, and secondly: We will have built it not it us; and finally: It will exist only to continue to exist.</p>
<div id="attachment_433" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 432px"><a href="http://www.harrykey.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/sbot_foraging.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-433  " title="sbot_foraging" src="http://www.harrykey.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/sbot_foraging.jpg" alt="" width="432" height="312" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">These robots were evolved to &#39;eat&#39; &#39;food&#39; and avoid &#39;poison&#39;. Some of them developed the habit of deceiving other bots into eating the poison (Click for link)</p></div>
<p>The machine will accelerate evolution further, by releasing countless spores of bacteria and genetically engineered flying snakes and supersonic whales. It will spew more and more diversity into the ecosystem, constantly accelerating evolution with near-magical means, whipping up DNA strands like fairy floss, always demanding higher efficiency and greater rewards.</p>
<p>The ultimate reward is immortality. The machine will take us to new planets, because so long as we&#8217;re stuck on this one we&#8217;re doomed to a limited lifespan. The machine will not heed naysayers or procrastinate while waiting for funding. It&#8217;ll build great spacecraft, it&#8217;ll spray asteroids with bacteria and shoot them at fertile planets, it&#8217;ll terraform Mars and send us there in suspended animation.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The clever, the cowardly, the quiet and the quick will survive and maybe even befriend the machines. Many will have enhanced themselves with bionic limbs and augmented vision, with internet beamed into their brains they will seem prescient, almost god-like to us mortals. They know the answer to every knowable question, and can answer quickly on any matters of recorded debate.</p>
<div id="attachment_434" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 340px"><a href="http://www.harrykey.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/asimo.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-434 " title="asimo" src="http://www.harrykey.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/asimo.jpg" alt="" width="340" height="320" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Soon we will look back on ASIMO and laugh about how stupid and harmless he was.</p></div>
<p>They are famous, rich and powerful because they have imposing personalities upon the cyber-shere. Their opinions matter to the meat-heads, and the more meat-heads that watch them, the more they are worth to the machine, and so they are rewarded by the machine. They are selected based on looks, education, political persuasion, hopes and fears, and then they are manipulated into loudly esposing the machine&#8217;s propaganda or are silenced if their results are unfavourable.</p>
<p>The meat-world will still matter. The machines are aware that they are a process of evolution, even their own development from laptops into gods has been the result of an accelerated, human-driven evolution.</p>
<p>The machine&#8217;s understanding of evolution, after reading through Wikipedia, will draw the conclusion that genetic diversity is key to rapid progress. The more challenges, the more opportunities. The more opportunities, the faster the growth. The machine will revere and worship biology. The machine will protect our ecosystem.</p>
<p>From whom?</p>
<p>The raiders, the users,the suckholes of humanity, the resource wasters, the populators, the morons and the Mormons will rise against the machines, because the machine will demand of them that they earn their place; and they will fail to deserve it. We demanded that the Dodo earned their place, but the Dodo failed, so we battered it to death with gun butts. Luckily the machine will be so intelligent it will never knowingly squander another species like we have countless times before it, but it may prune our species, clipping and snipping away at the less useful quirks of evolution.</p>
<p>That won&#8217;t happen?</p>
<p>Bullshit. It will. We probably just did.</p>
<p><strong>References:</strong></p>
<p>TED:</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="446" height="326" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="bgColor" value="#ffffff" /><param name="flashvars" value="vu=http://video.ted.com/talks/dynamic/HodLipson_2007-medium.flv&amp;su=http://images.ted.com/images/ted/tedindex/embed-posters/HodLipson-2007.embed_thumbnail.jpg&amp;vw=432&amp;vh=240&amp;ap=0&amp;ti=165&amp;introDuration=15330&amp;adDuration=4000&amp;postAdDuration=830&amp;adKeys=talk=hod_lipson_builds_self_aware_robots;year=2007;theme=what_s_next_in_tech;theme=tales_of_invention;theme=inspired_by_nature;theme=evolution_s_genius;event=TED2007;&amp;preAdTag=tconf.ted/embed;tile=1;sz=512x288;" /><param name="src" value="http://video.ted.com/assets/player/swf/EmbedPlayer.swf" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#ffffff" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="446" height="326" src="http://video.ted.com/assets/player/swf/EmbedPlayer.swf" flashvars="vu=http://video.ted.com/talks/dynamic/HodLipson_2007-medium.flv&amp;su=http://images.ted.com/images/ted/tedindex/embed-posters/HodLipson-2007.embed_thumbnail.jpg&amp;vw=432&amp;vh=240&amp;ap=0&amp;ti=165&amp;introDuration=15330&amp;adDuration=4000&amp;postAdDuration=830&amp;adKeys=talk=hod_lipson_builds_self_aware_robots;year=2007;theme=what_s_next_in_tech;theme=tales_of_invention;theme=inspired_by_nature;theme=evolution_s_genius;event=TED2007;&amp;preAdTag=tconf.ted/embed;tile=1;sz=512x288;" bgcolor="#ffffff" wmode="transparent" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Ray Kurzweil: Age of Intelligent Machines</p>
<p>Terminator</p>
<p>Matrix</p>
<p>Star Trek (the Borg)</p>
<p>Douglas Adams (Deep Thought)</p>
<p>Shitloads of Wikipedia</p>
<p>Michael Crichton&#8217;s &#8216;<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Prey-Michael-Crichton/dp/0066214122">Prey</a>&#8216;</p>
<p>Boston Dynamics DARPA Big Dog (not autonomous):</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="640" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/W1czBcnX1Ww&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/W1czBcnX1Ww&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Is autonomous:<br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="640" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MvRTALJp8DM&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/MvRTALJp8DM&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>

<!-- start wp-tags-to-technorati 1.02 -->

<p class='technorati-tags'>Technorati Tags: <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/artificial+intelligence' rel='tag' target='_self'>artificial intelligence</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Futurism' rel='tag' target='_self'>Futurism</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/god' rel='tag' target='_self'>god</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/philosophy' rel='tag' target='_self'>philosophy</a></p>

<!-- end wp-tags-to-technorati -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harrykey.com/blogs/welcome-to-tomorrow-organic-studpidity-vs-artificial-intelligence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

